| Table 2.2. Support for the political community | |||||||
| Country | Global regions | ||||||
| North | |||||||
| Western | Eastern | & Central | South | ||||
| Europe | Europe | Asia | Africa | America | America | Oceania | |
| Azerbaijan | 93 | ||||||
| Turkey | 92 | ||||||
| Peru | 86 | ||||||
| Venezuela | 85 | ||||||
| Slovenia | 85 | ||||||
| Sweden | 85 | ||||||
| China | 84 | ||||||
| Philippines | 83 | ||||||
| Norway | 81 | ||||||
| Finland | 78 | ||||||
| USA | 76 | ||||||
| Dominican Rep. | 75 | ||||||
| Australia | 73 | ||||||
| Belarus | 72 | ||||||
| Croatia | 71 | ||||||
| Mexico | 71 | ||||||
| Puerto Rico | 71 | ||||||
| Yugoslavia | 70 | ||||||
| Armenia | 70 | ||||||
| Georgia | 69 | ||||||
| South Africa | 69 | ||||||
| Chile | 67 | ||||||
| Brazil | 64 | ||||||
| Moldova | 63 | ||||||
| Argentina | 63 | ||||||
| Ukraine | 62 | ||||||
| Taiwan | 62 | ||||||
| Russia | 62 | ||||||
| Nigeria | 61 | ||||||
| Switzerland | 60 | ||||||
| Estonia | 58 | ||||||
| Spain | 58 | ||||||
| Uruguay | 56 | ||||||
| Lithuania | 54 | ||||||
| Latvia | 52 | ||||||
| East Germany | 37 | ||||||
| West Germany | 36 | ||||||
| Japan | 18 | ||||||
| MEAN | 66 | 67 | 62 | 65 | 73 | 71 | 73 |
| Note. Support for political community: the variables 'fight for country (0/1) and 'national pride' (recoded 1,2 = 0; 3,4=1) are added to form a three-point scale of support for the political community: 1 =low support; 2=medium support; and 3 = high support. The proportion of citizens with high support for the political community are displayed in the table. | |||||||
| Source: World Values Surveys, 1994/7. | |||||||
| Source: Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1999. "Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis." Pp. 31-56 in Pippa Norris, ed., Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |||||||